tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post113798619499307483..comments2024-02-24T11:50:55.413-08:00Comments on Lydia Cornell: BOOBGATE AGAIN?Fans and Friends of Lydia Cornellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01512357844572930333noreply@blogger.comBlogger190125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1139281316247176152006-02-06T19:01:00.000-08:002006-02-06T19:01:00.000-08:00Madam Hillary ... said the Bush administration "wi...<I>Madam Hillary ... said the Bush administration "will go down in history as one of the worst that has ever governed our country." While Hillary is certainly qualified to comment on what the all-time worst presidential administrations were, having had firsthand experience in one of them, I think she might want to avoid the phrase "go down in history." </I><BR/>-Ann CoulterFreedom Fanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05799821534276323350noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138608164617457492006-01-30T00:02:00.000-08:002006-01-30T00:02:00.000-08:00I recently read an article that said John Kennedy ...I recently read an article that said John Kennedy never really wanted to run for office,in fact he wanted to be a boxer,but (rim shot here) he could'nt take a shot to the head. I'm here all week,try the veal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138607136933846572006-01-29T23:45:00.000-08:002006-01-29T23:45:00.000-08:00Has anyone noticed that in most still photo's of N...Has anyone noticed that in most still photo's of Nancy Pelosi she has this wide eyed surprised look on her face like someone has snuck up behind her and rammed a broom handle up her kiester. It might be that rascal Harry Reid at work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138606733816731312006-01-29T23:38:00.000-08:002006-01-29T23:38:00.000-08:00Is it my imagination or is Ted Kennedy's head gett...Is it my imagination or is Ted Kennedy's head getting bigger?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138553900496720732006-01-29T08:58:00.000-08:002006-01-29T08:58:00.000-08:00Communism makes my blood boil; it just plain sucks...Communism makes my blood boil; it just plain sucks! While not infallible: Long live DEMOCRACY and all its cool freedoms. May it be preserved until the sun explodes. <BR/><BR/>I believe in "Freedom of Religion" 100%. I, in no way, desire a state similiar to that of Marx's writings on religion. <BR/><BR/>Freedom is indescribably sacred, and must be preserved despite my belief that religion does more harm than good. <BR/><BR/>Mike: <BR/><BR/>Good vs Evil<BR/><BR/>I dont want to freak you out or anything, however, I suggest mankind itself, and its search for utopia is a never-ending evolution....in other words ...the rabbit hole is bottomless. <BR/><BR/><BR/>Johnny moo mooAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138543538258796922006-01-29T06:05:00.000-08:002006-01-29T06:05:00.000-08:00Voltaire said... Lydia said, "Principle never chan...Voltaire said... <BR/>Lydia said, "Principle never changes"<BR/><BR/>"(Bush) is proud of himself for never changing his mind..."<BR/><BR/>WHO SAID HIS MIND IS PRINCIPLED?Fans and Friends of Lydia Cornellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01512357844572930333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138543437936093522006-01-29T06:03:00.000-08:002006-01-29T06:03:00.000-08:00Principle never changes: Going to war is not "a pr...Principle never changes: <BR/><BR/>Going to war is not "a principle"<BR/>Being stubborn is not a "principle", does not connote good (Godly) principes.<BR/><BR/>When making such an ominous decision as whether to commit young lives to war, great men question the validity of their thoughts, do not arrogantly claim they are talking to God (as Bush did.) They do not refuse to deeply weigh the consequences, the "exit strategy", the repurcussions, the enemy's wrath, the clergy's advice, the Pandora's box. Wise men do not skew the evidence, lie to the people, rush to war and claim victory before the pullout. <BR/><BR/>Principle: A basic truth, law, or assumption: the principles of democracy. A rule or standard, especially of good behavior. <BR/><BR/>Read Covey's book, The Seven Habits of Highly Successful People". Principles of good business are: fairness, truth, honesty, justice, democracy, unselfishness, compassion.. <BR/><BR/>All great men ponder, reflect, consult spiritual advisers and ask questions, doubt their own minds and weigh consequences.<BR/><BR/>‘To have doubted one’s own first principles, is the mark of a civilized man.’ — Ralph Waldo Emerson <BR/> <BR/>‘Let every student of nature take this as his rule that whatever the mind seizes upon with particular satisfaction is to be held in suspicion.’ — Francis Bacon <BR/><BR/>‘If a Man will begin with certainties, he will end in doubts; but if he will be content to begin with doubts he will end in certainties.’ — Francis Bacon <BR/><BR/>‘If you would be a real seeker after truth, it is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things.’ — René Descartes <BR/><BR/>‘I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it is much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong.’ — Richard P. Feynman <BR/><BR/>‘The way to be safe is never to be secure.’ — Benjamin Franklin <BR/><BR/>‘Doubt is the father of invention.’<BR/>— Galileo Galilei <BR/><BR/>‘Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it.’<BR/>— André Gide <BR/><BR/>‘We know accurately only when we know little; with knowledge doubt enters.’ — Johann Wolfgang von Goethe <BR/><BR/>‘In all affairs it’s a healthy thing now and then to hang a question mark on the things you have long taken for granted.’<BR/><BR/>— Bertrand Russell <BR/><BR/>‘Modest doubt is call’d the beacon of the wise.’<BR/><BR/>— William Shakespeare <BR/><BR/><BR/>‘Doubt is the beginning, not the end, of wisdom.’ — George IlesFans and Friends of Lydia Cornellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01512357844572930333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138521321308726562006-01-28T23:55:00.000-08:002006-01-28T23:55:00.000-08:00Lydia said,"Principle never changes""He’s proud of...Lydia said,<BR/><BR/>"Principle <B>never</B> changes"<BR/><BR/>"He’s proud of himself for never changing his mind..."<BR/><BR/>"I don’t want a Supreme Court justice that doesn’t change his or her mind in 20 years..."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138520752969377312006-01-28T23:45:00.000-08:002006-01-28T23:45:00.000-08:00"FISA was instituted at a time when a wiretap cons..."FISA was instituted at a time when a wiretap consisted of rerouting the phone calls of a specific suspect who was part of an ongoing investigation and then listening to or recording them. Wiretaps were a tool for figuring out what a known bad guy was doing and gathering evidence to use against him in a court case. When you went to get a warrant for a wire tap you knew who you were spying on, who he was likely to be calling and were working with a limited and identifiable number of people and phones he could be calling from and to.<BR/><BR/>With modern phone technology traditional wiretaps have become increasingly ineffective. Cell phones, satellite phones, internet VOIP technology, and common availability of high-quality encryption have made it much more difficult to listen in on a phonecall assuming you can even figure out what phone a suspect is likely to be using. When a terrorist can just stop in at 7-11 and get a new cell phone for $50 and then throw it away after his phonecall, how are you supposed to know what line he is likely to be calling from or even know when he's making a phonecall at all?"<BR/><BR/>"Digital data mining doesn't work well at all with FISA, which was designed on the assumptions of an analog era. Under FISA the NSA would have to request a warrant for every single phonecall which was automatically picked up and recorded by their data mining software within 3 days. Let's say they were monitoring calls in a largely Arab neighborhood in Detroit. That might mean going through thousands of phonecalls, translating them from Arabic to English and sorting them to find the relevant ones all within that three day limit set by FISA. Even though they're hiring every Arabic speaking person who can pass a background check, they just don't have the resources to do this in the time frame required. Even if they did, it would put them in a position where they have to process thousands of irrelevant warrants just to meet the requirements of FISA - a huge paperwork burden to further reduce their efficiency.<BR/><BR/>Another problem was introduced by the passage of an amendment to FISA in 2003. This amendment limited monitoring to non-US citizens or people outside of the US, but data mining has no way of determining where participants in a phonecall are or what their nationality is before it automatically initiates monitoring of a phonecall, so since the passage of this amendment data mining operations have almost automatically been in violation of the FISA law. As a result, starting in 2003 the FISA court began rejecting or modifying a great many warrants which would have been been more or less automatically approved prior to that time."<BR/><BR/>http://www.fontcraft.com/csa/politicscomments.php?id=483_0_7_0_CAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138519530003924942006-01-28T23:25:00.000-08:002006-01-28T23:25:00.000-08:00Voltaire said: Yeah, silly to think a 30 year old ...Voltaire said: <BR/>Yeah, silly to think a 30 year old law made before disposable cell phones, satellite phones and the internet is outdated.... <BR/><BR/>You Voltaire, have fallen into the trap of putting style over substance. What do the externals (cell phones, etc.) have to do with it? Principle never changes. The law is based on basic principles which protect the basic foundation of our democracy. <BR/><BR/>"The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, known as FISA, was passed by Congress after revelations of domestic surveillance abuses (Watergate/Nixon.) It created a secret court to review surveillance requests and issue warrants, specifically allowing for retroactive approval in emergency situations.<BR/><BR/>Voltaire and other right-wingers: You see, we probably wouldn't be so upset by this if we trusted out president on all the other things he has done. But he has tipped the scale toward fascism to concentrate power in the executive branch -- the very thing our forefathers warned against, no matter what the circumstances. Check and balances are vital for this very reason. <BR/><BR/>Bush lying about the war, his insane rush to war, his inability to reflect deeply or ponder his own intransigence, his slow reaction to Katrina, his arrogance with the environment, his inability to make wise appointments that don't involve nepotism, his choice of Alito -- a man who shows none of the qualities of a compassionate "judge" who cares about people, as Solomon was; his bizarre Social Security agenda, his LYING ABOUT JACK ABRAMOFF BEING ON HIS TRANSITION TEAM, his team itself with Scooter Libby and Rove outing Valerie Plame -- and of course his FLIPPANT ATTITUDE ABOUT BREAKING THE LAW in this 4th amendment issue -- all these things have really set off red flags. <BR/><BR/>Who in his right mind would trust this man? And you wonder why we don't trust him when he says he's just spying on international calls to Al Queda? If he were a good person whom we trusted, we'd be on his side. <BR/><BR/>I have a feeling they want this information to formulate a strategy -- to find out where their base is, to ostracize certain people and find out their reading/buying/voting habits. To maybe prevent whole communities from voting -- or even worse. <BR/><BR/>Do you feel that you can still say anything if you're on the opposite side of Ann Coulter? Why does she get to yell fire in a crowded theater -- and no one stops her? Why are any opposing views relegated to alternative media? <BR/><BR/>"But the law has been modified several times since 1978, including in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when the length of an emergency surveillance before seeking a retroactive warrant was tripled from 24 hours to 72 hours."<BR/><BR/>``The idea that this law is some kind of dinosaur is a misunderstanding,'' said Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, who has studied FISA.Fans and Friends of Lydia Cornellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01512357844572930333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138516653280966502006-01-28T22:37:00.000-08:002006-01-28T22:37:00.000-08:00Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appen...Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35<BR/>January 10, 1963<BR/><BR/>Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG,<BR/>JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10,<BR/>1963 .<BR/><BR/>Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is<BR/>an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently<BR/>published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of<BR/>alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.<BR/><BR/>At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous<BR/>consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she<BR/>identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon<BR/>Skousen:<BR/><BR/><BR/>1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic<BR/>war.<BR/><BR/>2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in<BR/>atomic war.<BR/><BR/>3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United<BR/>States would be a demonstration of moral strength.<BR/><BR/>4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist<BR/>affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for<BR/>war.<BR/><BR/>5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.<BR/><BR/>6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist<BR/>domination.<BR/><BR/>7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.<BR/><BR/>8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of<BR/>Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free<BR/>elections under supervision of the U.N.<BR/><BR/>9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United<BR/>States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in<BR/>progress.<BR/><BR/>10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.<BR/><BR/>11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is<BR/>rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with<BR/>its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe<BR/>the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow.<BR/>Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now<BR/>doing in the Congo.)<BR/><BR/>12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.<BR/><BR/>13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.<BR/><BR/>14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.<BR/><BR/><B>15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United<BR/>States.</B><BR/>-guess which one got captured?<BR/><BR/><B>16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American<BR/>institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.<BR/><BR/>17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for<BR/>socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum.<BR/>Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in<BR/>textbooks.<BR/><BR/>18. Gain control of all student newspapers.<BR/><BR/>19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or<BR/>organizations which are under Communist attack.<BR/><BR/>20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments,<BR/>editorial writing, policy-making positions.<BR/><BR/>21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.<BR/><BR/>22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of<BR/>artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told<BR/>to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings,<BR/>substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."<BR/><BR/>23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is<BR/>to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."<BR/><BR/>24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling<BR/>them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.<BR/><BR/>25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting<BR/>pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures,<BR/>radio, and TV.<BR/><BR/>26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal,<BR/>natural, healthy."<BR/><BR/>27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion<BR/>with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need<BR/>for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."<BR/><BR/>28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the<BR/>schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation<BR/>of church and state."</B><BR/><BR/>29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate,<BR/>old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to<BR/>cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.<BR/><BR/><B>30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish<BR/>aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."</B><BR/><BR/>31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the<BR/>teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor<BR/>part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history<BR/>since the Communists took over.<BR/><BR/><B>32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over<BR/>any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare<BR/>programs, mental health clinics, etc.</B><BR/><BR/>33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the<BR/>operation of the Communist apparatus.<BR/><BR/><B>34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.</B><BR/><BR/>35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.<BR/><BR/><B>36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.</B><BR/><BR/>37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.<BR/><BR/><B>38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social<BR/>agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders<BR/>which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].<BR/><BR/>39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws<BR/>as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose<BR/>Communist goals.<BR/><BR/>40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity<BR/>and easy divorce.<BR/><BR/>41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative<BR/>influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and<BR/>retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.</B><BR/><BR/>42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are<BR/>legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and<BR/>special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to<BR/>solve economic, political or social problems.<BR/><BR/>43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are<BR/>ready for self-government.<BR/><BR/><B>44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.<BR/><BR/>45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot<BR/>prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic<BR/>problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and<BR/>individuals alike.</B>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138516121205454692006-01-28T22:28:00.000-08:002006-01-28T22:28:00.000-08:00drool said..."It's pretty silly to think that a la...<B>drool said...</B><BR/><BR/>"It's pretty silly to think that a law passed in 1978 is out of date. That's just ridiculous."<BR/><BR/>Yeah, silly to think a 30 year old law made <B><I>before disposable cell phones, satellite phones and the internet</I></B> is outdated....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138515552854481892006-01-28T22:19:00.000-08:002006-01-28T22:19:00.000-08:00Lydia said: Bush said, in 2002, "Wiretapping requi...Lydia said: Bush said, in 2002, "Wiretapping requires a court order." Now he says, "The FISA law was written in 1978.<BR/>We're having the discussion in 2006. It's a different world." How convenient. THE TEN COMMANDMENTS were made over 2000 years ago. It's a different world, aren't you going to change them? (paraphrased from Randi Rhodes on Air America yesterday.)<BR/><BR/>Excellent point, Lyd (and Randi)! And while they're at it, they might as well change the Constitution since it's over 200 years old.<BR/><BR/>Oh, wait. That's right. They ARE trying to change the Constitution. Silly me. General Hayden has already removed probable cause from the Fourth Amendment. Can't wait to find out what gets erased next.<BR/><BR/>It's pretty silly to think that a law passed in 1978 is out of date. That's just ridiculous. And even if it needed some updating, they could have done that. But they chose not to. And we need to know why. We DESERVE to know why. And we all need to demand that they come clean on it. NOW!DrewLhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02358111719934993397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138513841556070252006-01-28T21:50:00.000-08:002006-01-28T21:50:00.000-08:00I also see Cindy Al-Sheehani is considering runnin...I also see Cindy Al-Sheehani is considering running for DiFi's seat...<BR/><BR/>Of course her manager/organizer Medea Benjamin (Code Pinko/communist) tried it herself once or twice and lost even in Berzerkely....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138513607537108162006-01-28T21:46:00.000-08:002006-01-28T21:46:00.000-08:00"To be fair to Diebold, the Hursti Hack requires a..."To be fair to Diebold, the Hursti Hack requires a moderate level of <B>inside access</B>, however it does not require a password and it is the same level of access given thousands of <B>poll workers</B> across the USA"<BR/><BR/>-So not just <B><I>anybody</I></B> could walk in and do it....<BR/><BR/>And poll workers are taken from BOTH parties and I'm sure they watch each other like a hawk. Especially in Floriduh...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138499248134706342006-01-28T17:47:00.001-08:002006-01-28T17:47:00.001-08:00Diebold in FloridaBy SUSAN PYNCHONI was one of ten...Diebold in Florida<BR/>By SUSAN PYNCHON<BR/>I was one of ten people present at the "hack" of the Leon County, Florida voting system, which took place on Tuesday, December 13, 2005 around 4:30 in the afternoon at the county elections warehouse. Leon County's voting system is the Diebold Accu-Vote OS 1.94w (optical scan).<BR/>The Leon County Supervisor of Elections, Ion Sancho, authorized a "test" of his Diebold voting system to see if election results could be altered using only a memory card. Harri Hursti, a computer programmer from Finland facilitated the test and it has come to be known as the "Harri Hursti Hack."<BR/>What follows is my description of that hack and its significance for our nation, which I hope will correct much of the misinformation circulating regarding this event.<BR/>To select which voting machine to use for the test, Ion drew a serial number of one voting machine from a container holding all the serial numbers of all the Leon County machines...<BR/><BR/>......And there, on the central tabulator screen, appeared the altered results: Seven "Yes" votes and one "No" vote, with absolutely no evidence that anything had been altered. It was a powerful moment and, I will admit, it had the unexpected result for me personally of causing me to break down and cry. Why did I cry? It was the last thing I thought I would do, but it happened for so many reasons. I cried because it was so clear that Diebold had been lying. I cried because there was proof, before my very eyes, that these machines were every bit as bad as we all had feared. I cried because we have been so unjustly attacked as "conspiracy theorists" and "technophobes" when Diebold knew full well that its voting system could alter election results. More than that, that Diebold planned to have a voting system that could alter results. And I cried because it suddenly hit me, like a Mack truck, that this was proof positive that our democracy is and has been, as we have all feared, truly at the mercy of unscrupulous vendors who are producing electronic voting machines that can change election results without detection.<BR/>Beyond this, however, what is the real significance of the "Harri Hursti hack?" There are several answers to that question.<BR/>First of all, the Hursti hack reveals only one vulnerability in an almost unlimited number of potential flaws or vulnerabilities in electronic voting systems (both op-scans and DREs). However, the Hursti hack is individually significant because the flaw it exposed is a planned vulnerability in the system, not something that is accidentally there. It had to be PUT there (programmed) on purpose. For Diebold to claim innocence about this would be absurd. It would be like saying you didn't know your garage had a door while you were standing there holding the garage door opener. Or, because this security vulnerability is so huge, it would more accurately be like saying you didn't know your house had a garage at all!! <BR/>Since something like 95% of computer scientists agree that electronic voting machines (op-scans and DREs) have an almost infinite number of potential flaws or vulnerabilities, the Hursti hack shows, above all, THE IMPORTANCE OF HAVING PAPER BALLOTS for an independent confirmation of machine results.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138499236144839062006-01-28T17:47:00.000-08:002006-01-28T17:47:00.000-08:00Hey worfeus,your pocket protector is leaking ink.Hey worfeus,your pocket protector is leaking ink.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138498899931482322006-01-28T17:41:00.000-08:002006-01-28T17:41:00.000-08:00Lets all guess just when the next liberal will be ...Lets all guess just when the next liberal will be president.Let me see...never.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138498586832182752006-01-28T17:36:00.000-08:002006-01-28T17:36:00.000-08:00ANONYMOUS: What does this mean? YOur comment about...ANONYMOUS: What does this mean? YOur comment about the grassy knoll and twits? Do you not know about the hack test at Diebold in Florida? I wonder why.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138495805920826942006-01-28T16:50:00.000-08:002006-01-28T16:50:00.000-08:00For Christ sake anonmymous "Diebold"? You twits wi...For Christ sake anonmymous "Diebold"? You twits will be on the grassy knoll next.No wonder you people cant lead anything.Idiots.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138482675967489862006-01-28T13:11:00.000-08:002006-01-28T13:11:00.000-08:00Johnny did say his "Dream", if i'm dreaming its go...Johnny did say his "Dream", if i'm dreaming its going to be 2 houses with one in the mountains on a lake and with a 10-15 car garage for all my toys, may as well dream big right :D<BR/><BR/>MikeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138474286680661982006-01-28T10:51:00.000-08:002006-01-28T10:51:00.000-08:00Sounds like a plan to me Johnny, make sure you inv...Sounds like a plan to me Johnny, make sure you invite me to this Mountain retreat, actually i've always wanted to see the Canadian Rockies, that or driving up the California and West Coast will probably be my next big vacation 1n 2007 or 2008, I travel to South Florida a bunch of times a year and Buffalo once or twice a year but havent gone any where else in about 6 years. I too would love a second home in the mountains on a lake but that will have to wait till I retire if i'm lucky enough.<BR/><BR/>MikeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138463148734147952006-01-28T07:45:00.000-08:002006-01-28T07:45:00.000-08:00Sorry Mike for not answering your Western Canada q...Sorry Mike for not answering your Western Canada question. Ghost of Worfeus and I were just tickling each others brains. <BR/><BR/>I have been to British Columbia many times and its beautiful. Actually, my dream is to build a nice, little log cabin style home there; up in the mountains overlooking a clear blue lake :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138461803250210362006-01-28T07:23:00.000-08:002006-01-28T07:23:00.000-08:00WE DID WIN THE NATIONAL ELECTION - TWICE. WE ARE T...WE DID WIN THE NATIONAL ELECTION - TWICE. <BR/><BR/>WE ARE THE ONLY NATION IN THE WORLD THAT INSTALLED PAPERLESS, TRACELESS ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES.....just in time for this last election. Find out who owns Diebold and how the machines were hacked in Florida -- in an experiment, with no evidence of tampering. The votes were actually flip-switched and Diebold had to admit the truth. State by state we have to get back PAPER BALLOTS. <BR/><BR/>That were hacked -- read the Dieb-throat story.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102706.post-1138436831672889822006-01-28T00:27:00.000-08:002006-01-28T00:27:00.000-08:00My goodness,you liberals sure do have quite a bit ...My goodness,you liberals sure do have quite a bit of anger.Here's a hint,why dont you go out and win a national election?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com