Thursday, March 26, 2009

QUANTUM LEAP * 11:11 * LEAP BACK 2009 BENEFITS STARLIGHT FOUNDATION

I'll be signing autographs at Leap Back 9009 * The Quantum Leap Convention tomorrow. Please stop by! ALL PROCEEDS GO TO STARLIGHT FOUNDATION for seriously ill children StarLight.org


Tomorrow, Friday March 26th I will be signing autographs and talking about the wild experiences filming the pilot of the hit Univseral series QUANTUM LEAP starring Dean Stockwell and Scott Bakula.

I will be at the Beverly Garland Hotel for "Leap Back 2009" 20th Anniversary of Quantum Leap - the series. All proceeds benefit the STARLIGHT FOUNDATION StarLight.org

If you haven't seen GENESIS 1 & 2 you can buy it on Amazon.com. The Blue Angels flew overhead for one of our pivotal scenes and we filmed the 2-hour movie at Edwards Airforce Base in California.

I have some very great stories of this 3-week shoot in the middle of winter. I had short dark hair in this episode.

You can still get tickets at the door. It's a three day convention. I will be there from 1:30 until 4:30 tomorrow, Friday March 27 and I'll drop by sometime on Sunday to visit with Scott Bakula, Series creator Don Bellisario and James Whitmore, jr. who directed my Hunter episode.

Starlight Children's Foundation™

The Leap Back 2009 proudly supports the Starlight Children's Foundation! Proceeds made from the convention after all expenses are paid will be donated to this fantastic organization. We're also holding a special charity auction featuring rare memorabilia of which 100% of the proceeds will be given to the foundation!

In "Quantum Leap", Dr. Sam Beckett leaped from life to life, putting things right that once went wrong. In real life, we can't change history, but we can make things a little more right for many of these children that the foundation assists! We believe every person can make a difference in a child's life. By purchasing your admission to this convention, you are helping make a difference in a child's life. If you are unable to attend, we hope you'll make a contribution to the Starlight Children's Foundation through their website or by calling (310) 479-1212.

Here is an introduction taken from the Starlight Children Foundation's website:

Starlight Children's Foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to making a world of difference for seriously ill children and their families.

We touch the lives of a sick child and family all along their journey through a serious illness, from the time of diagnosis all the way through, in the hospital and at home. Families become part of our community and we work hard to meet their needs in a wide variety of ways. We build playrooms and teen lounges in hospitals and provide PC Pals and Fun Centers so kids can play games, e-mail, chat with friends, and even do their homework from their hospital bed. We bring in entertainers and sponsor parties for kids who are stuck in the hospital. When the kids get to go home, we keep them connected them through online chat rooms and special outings for the entire family. We provide them with information about specific illnesses and treatments on our websites and through videos and games we create. We distribute hundreds of thousands of books and toys every year. We are there for them at the time they need it most.

Starlight softens the hard edges of what a family experiences when a child has a serious illness. We create a sense of community between families who are having similar experiences by providing opportunities for them to escape the hospital, doctors, nurses, needles and treatments and doing something fun where they get to join others and just feel "normal" again--perhaps even forgetting that anyone is sick for a short while.

For more information or to make a donation, please visit StarLight.org to learn more about what this great organization does worldwide for children with serious illnesses! Please watch this short video telling you a little more about Starlight Children's Foundation.


____________________

Last night I was reading Steve Pavlina's blog, which I discovered two years ago by accident. I saw the "11:11" in the bottom right-hand corner of his post. I couldn't believe it. I never knew he was also one of us. I checked to see if it was just a time stamp but it was on another post too. Then I discovered an article he had written quite recently called "11:11." When I read the first sentence -- that he started seeing this in 1994 chills went down my spine. 1994 was when I began to see the 11:11, after the most uncanny Twilight-Zonish coincidence of my life. I saw it many times a day on so many things you can imagine (not just digital clocks) and I began to manifest every thing I really thought about... For years I've been hesitant to write or speak about this except to close friends who are like-minded. I've written about it in my journals and have owned an email address for 15 years with a version of this name. But I just wanted to finally put this out there.

464 comments:

  1. I Love when celebrities open their hearts to charities...without condition or cash. It's really nice to see this particular charity get some help from you and your friends. It reminds me of the many "charities" that were set in place to help my disabled sister. ie The Catholic Women's Charity, The Cerebral Palsy Foundation, Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center. My sister wasn't supposed to hit puberty...the doctors figured she'd pass by 9 or 10 years old. By the help of these Charities and Foundations, she led a full happy life full of spirit and smiles. She opened the minds of a lot of people...and the many that came when she passed in my arms were changed forever...by love and heart. I speak a lot about her. So, folks open you hearts and spare a couple of bucks to help out some children that don't have what we take for granted... No one knows anyones lifespan...so if people like Lydia, Stevie Nicks, Ann Wilson and Elizabeth Taylor do unpaid, unsung charity work...then you and I can certainly spare a buck or two...to make a kid's timespace may it be small or long...a little bit better. God Bless you Lydia and Friends...

    Jim & The Spiritual Memory Of My Beautiful, Perfect Sister Patti.

    PS: Due to Charities like this one...my sister lived to the summer before her 40th birthday. And I know her spirit, legacy of love...is looking down and helping a lot of people in need.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey you guys...I just posted this story on CNN's Website...I hope they promote or air it. What a loving worthy cause. Here is the CNN.COM link to the story.

    http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-235647

    ReplyDelete
  3. The point, Lydia, of bringing up Rush Limbaugh's drug use is....? I mean, is it a response to the right's constant cheap-shotting of Obama on the Ayers, et. al. stuff? And, really, how do you square all of this "love your enemy stuff" with this constant denigration of those who disagree with you? Two wrongs don't make a virtue, kiddo. They only create a third (and, yes, much more dangerous) wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Excuse me while I brace for some vitriol (not necessarily from you, Lydia, but from some of your more bellicose associates).

    ReplyDelete
  5. You're right Will, but I don't think anyone should be listening to the hateful, ruinous rantings of an Oxycontin addict who makes 45 million dollars a year to carry the giant corporate agenda -- which is self-serving.

    How is a person who is under anesthesia helping the public good?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...
    The point, Lydia, of bringing up Rush Limbaugh's drug use is....? I mean, is it a response to the right's constant cheap-shotting of Obama on the Ayers, et. al. stuff? And, really, how do you square all of this "love your enemy stuff" with this constant denigration of those who disagree with you? Two wrongs don't make a virtue, "kiddo."

    Wow...kiddo! Are you my white trash 60 year old mother in law? Andrea?

    Sounds more like a scolding than anything else of subsance...

    Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...
    Excuse me while I brace for some vitriol (not necessarily from you, Lydia, but from some of your more bellicose associates).


    Vitriol from her bellicose associates? Aren't you one too? I can picture the white coats chasing you while you're scolding yourself about the Rush comment you made. And you were supposed to brace yourself! Not LIE to yourself!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't listen to him, Lydia. He appeals only to the base. And I realize that often his tenor is poor as well. But, seriously, somebody's got yo be constructive here. Why not me?

    ReplyDelete
  8. You seem interesting, No Fear. Not exactly sure how to respond, though. Peace and love, perhaps?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    I don't listen to him, Lydia.



    Well that is something you can state but cannot demonstrate.

    But you were defending him, and that's bad enough.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...


    But, seriously, somebody's got yo be constructive here. Why not me?


    That depends on what you're constructing.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No Fear - great photo. Love your comment!! and Thank you for putting it on CNN!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Will -- Rush Limbaugh has contributed to "the BIG LIE" which is every bit as "evil" as the lie of Communism under Stalin's propaganda machine. The fact that someone so hateful and vitriolic and pompous can be funded by a media machine that won't even allow an alternative viewpoint on their entire radio network is suspicious, isn't it?

    He fancies himself a King with minions called "Dittoheads" who parrot his every lie.

    I don't see how anyone can defend someone as unpatriotic and selfish as Rush, who promoted failure of Obama, racism, the hatred of liberals (which led to killing of liberals via the shooting in the Unitarian Church -- committed by a "Dittohead."

    He has no interest in the truth or compassion or love. I do pray for him. I have tried to put myself in his shoes but they won't fit.

    He has put a wall of self-protection and can't seem to have empathy for anyone, even the women he "dates."

    This man should be taken off the air and banished.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ir Rush Limbaugh ever ran for president, Lydia, he'd get about 20%. He's not as powerful as you think. And I don't think I'm really "defending" him. I just don't think that getting into an ad hominem spitting contest with him elevates the discussion. P.S. Just for the record, I've been a consistent critic of right wing media sources for 2 years now (I just got done penning a critique of Fox News's Karl Rove). I just try and do it without underscoring a person's personal foibles.

    ReplyDelete
  14. No, I can't "prove" that I DON'T listen to him. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  15. Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    Ir Rush Limbaugh ever ran for president, Lydia, he'd get about 20%. He's not as powerful as you think. And I don't think I'm really "defending" him. I just don't think that getting into an ad hominem spitting contest with him elevates the discussion



    You're not only defending him but you're also mocking Lydia (as you've done before) for daring to stand up to his nonsense.

    Each time Lydia does a story about him out comes Will's passive aggressive "CONCERNS" trying to convince people to not stand up to Rush.

    You denounce all attempts to stand up to the man as petty and "spitting contests", thus deflating any criticism of him by reducing it to the level of petty bickering.

    Which its not. Its called standing up to a bully.

    And you try to diminish Rush's impact by spouting indemonstrable nonsense like "I don't listen to him" and that "he's not so powerful".

    The guys got the biggest market share of right wing listeners in the world. He is the best known most vocal outspoken critic of the left that there is. His audience is HUGE, and yet here Will is, saying "...he's not that powerful".

    So we see Will will lie outright even to defend Rush.

    And then lie about defending, because after all, you're a concern troll, nothing more.

    ReplyDelete
  16. If I wanted to defend an indefensible person, someone really foul and impossible to openly defend, then I'd mock the very idea of criticizing him.

    I'd make it appear juvenile and petty to confront this person, and liken any criticisms of him to a petty "spitting contest", so as to dissuade and deflate the arguments against him.

    And that's just what Will does. He did it just a little while ago. Lydia wrote about Rush and radio and in comes Will,..."ohhhh, Rush isn't so important, why do you criticize him, you shouldn't engage in spitting contests, I'm concerned I'm concerned...".


    Same thing every time.

    He can't defeat the criticisms, so he attempts to try to defeat the idea of criticizing him.

    That's called Concern Trolling 101.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Right out of the Karl Rove handbook.

    ReplyDelete
  18. My discussion here is with Lydia. I'm not dealing with drazy people anymore. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Lydia, my point about Limbaugh is that, while his influence is deep, it's not particularly wide. And I've also heard (I think it was from Olbermann, actually LOL) that the people who DO listen to him, the average length of their "tuning in" is only about 15 minutes a day. And I never said that Limbaugh shouldn't be criticized. I just don't think that it's necessary to constantly bring up his drug use, just like I think it's cheap shot for Obama's enemies to bring up his past indiscetions regarding drugs. It's gratuitous and nothing more. Intellectually dominate Limbaugh. Don't turn yourself into his alter-ego. Look, Lydia, I'm just giving you my opinion, that's all. Feel free not to agree with it.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    My discussion here is with Lydia. I'm not dealing with drazy people anymore. Sorry.


    Well I try to avoid "drazy" people too.

    And as for your "discussion being with Lydia", you're in a blog, not a private chat room so your comments are open for rebuttal to anyone who bothers to read them.

    And your "discussion" is the same nonsense you spouted the last time Lydia did an article criticizing Rush Limbaugh.

    You came in and tried to convince people that it was pointless to stand up to Limbaugh, and like today, you tried to diminish any criticism of him to a simple "spitting contest".

    And just like today, you were apparently able to delude yourself into thinking you were actually fooling anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Will "take no prisoners" Hart LIE..

    Lydia, my point about Limbaugh is that, while his influence is deep, it's not particularly wide. And I've also heard (I think it was from Olbermann, actually LOL) that the people who DO listen to him, the average length of their "tuning in" is only about 15 minutes a day


    And the truth;



    His nationally syndicated talk show, The Rush Limbaugh Show, airs throughout the United States on Premiere Radio Networks. He has been credited with reviving AM radio in the United States,[2] and was inducted into the Radio Hall of Fame in 1993. The National Review magazine, in a 1993 cover story, called him "The Leader of the Opposition" during the Clinton administration[3].

    He is a bestselling author, with two titles on the New York Times Best Seller list in the 1990s.

    Limbaugh's radio show airs weekdays for three hours daily, beginning at 12 noon Eastern time in the U.S.

    It also is carried worldwide over the Armed Forces Radio Network, and in some markets is carried on FM stations.

    According to a 2001 article in U.S. News & World Report, Limbaugh had an eight-year contract, at the rate of $31.25 million a year.[16] On July 2, 2008, Matt Drudge reported that Limbaugh signed a contract extension through 2016 that is worth over $400 million, breaking records for any broadcast medium — television or radio.




    See folks? See how the "concern troll" works?

    Will wants to convince Lydia that Rush's show isn't that widely listened to. And the average listener doesn't really pay much attention.

    But the truth we see is the complete opposite.

    His show is carried nationwide, on both AM and FM stations across the country. His show is broadcast over the ARMED FORCES RADIO NETWORK, he is a BEST SELLING AUTHOR and commands the LARGEST SALARY of ANY radio or television broadcast medium world wide.

    :|

    So we see the truth, is the complete opposite of what Willy boy here presents.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The truth is talking about Limbaughs drug usage is central to discussing the man. After all he made part of his fortune off of CONDEMNING ILLEGAL DRUG USERS.

    So addressing the HUBRIS of this man, is perfectly legitimate and in fact crucial to understanding the man.

    But "Will" wants to diminish it to a petty "spitting contest".

    Since he can't defeat the critique he tries to defeat the very idea of the critique.

    Well Willy, the critique stands.

    And no ones falling for your concern trolling, troll.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yea, the guys a BEST SELLING AUTHOR, his show is broadcast NATIONWIDE and on the ARMED FORCES RADIO NETWORK, he's paid more than ANY other broadcast medium in the WORLD, and he's been inducted into the Radio HALL OF FAME.

    But Will wants you to think he's "not widely listened to" and he's "not that powerful".

    lol

    Sure Will.

    Thats why they're paying him FOUR HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS.

    :|

    Cause no ones listening.

    BAWAHAHAHAAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
  24. A concern troll is a false flag pseudonym created by a user whose actual point of view is opposed to the one that the user's sockpuppet claims to hold.

    The concern troll posts in web forums devoted to its declared point of view and attempts to sway the group's actions or opinions while claiming to share their goals, but with professed "concerns".


    Wikipedia.org

    ReplyDelete
  25. Just like Will did back in January, when Lydia addressed Limbaugh in her article;



    Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    I usually don't support Limbaugh. But,

    ReplyDelete
  26. Just like Will tried to back Lydia off on standing up to Ann Coulter;

    Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    One of the comments was about Ann Coulter. I made fun of her. But I also made fun of US for taking her so seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Yea don't take Ann Coulter "seriously" folks. Even though she spreads right wing hate and smears, remember. If we stand up to her, we're "being silly".

    And Rush Limbaugh? Don't worry about him. He has no audience to worry about.

    They just pay him 400 MILLION DOLLARS, because no ones listening.

    Feel free to "discuss them", just make sure you don't criticize the very things that deserve criticism.

    :|

    So says the concern troll.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I've also noticed, Lydia, that you have this long-standing fued with Ann Coulter. I don't know, me, I just kind of see her as a provacateur/opportunist/cartoon character. I generally DON'T take her seriously and, no, tend not to respond (though I did do a recent post criticizing her for saying that liberal men weren't "real men"). To me, it would be kind of like debating Elmer Fudd (though in this instance, granted, Elmer Fudd is laughing all the way to the bank LOL). As for Limbaugh, I never said that he didn't have an audience (a big audience even - by radio standards) or that you shouldn't "take him on". I'm just saying that you've got to put it into perspective. In my opinion, Rush Limbaugh couldn't be elected dog-catcher. Add to that the fact that, like Michael Steele said, he's a flaming entertainer, and what do you really have? Seriously. P.S. If you really and truly want to make fun of his past drug use, that's obviously up to you. Just think about what I said initially, O.K.?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Thought I'd pop in to share some good news.

    Lately, I've been hanging out over at the ThinkProgress blog. As I'm sure you're aware, Bill "Falafel" O'reilly recently had one of his minions stalk and harrass one of the blog's editors. As a result, we started contacting his sponsors letting them know we don't appreciate the way he conducts business. UPS announced today they will no longer be advertising on his program.

    Score one for the good guys! We're taking our country back!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    I've also noticed, Lydia, that you have this long-standing fued with Ann Coulter. I don't know, me, I just kind of see her as a provacateur/opportunist/cartoon character.

    I generally DON'T take her seriously...



    Said the concern troll to the blog hostess.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Funny. Just recently Will was also "not defending" Limbaugh...


    :|

    Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    I usually don't support Limbaugh. But, in this case, I think that Volt is correct.

    ReplyDelete
  32. And here he is likewise, "not supporting Rush Limbaugh"


    Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    I hear your points, Lydia.

    But, I'm sorry, if people are stupid enough to get their news only from right-wing punditry/radio, then, yeah, we pretty much deserve the government we get

    ReplyDelete
  33. Its easier to defend someone when you don't have to defend them, but instead simply convince their critics to not criticize them.

    Convince them that it is pointless to criticize them on this or that topic, and the concern troll has defended his patron, without every having to actually defend them.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.

    Thus the highest form of generalship is to balk the enemy's plans


    - The Art of War
    Sun Tzu

    ReplyDelete
  35. Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    I've also noticed, Lydia, that you have this long-standing fued with Ann Coulter.

    I don't know, me, I just kind of see her as a provacateur/opportunist/cartoon character.

    I generally DON'T take her seriously.



    Yea Lydia, what's wrong with you?

    Don't stand up to Ann Coulter.

    Back off, and don't offer rebuttals to her right wing hate speech.

    Just 'leave her alone'.

    :|

    Like Will wants you too.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Just like he wanted recently in another thread.


    Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    One of the comments was about Ann Coulter. I made fun of her.

    But I also made fun of US for taking her so seriously.


    See Lydia?

    If you stand up to Ann Coulter, then Will will have to mock you.

    Because you shouldn't stand up to Ann Coulter Lydia.

    :|

    At least that's what Will says.

    ReplyDelete
  37. :|



    The skillful leader subdues the enemy's troops without any fighting;

    He captures their cities without laying siege to them.


    - The Art of War
    Sun Tzu

    ReplyDelete
  38. Blogger Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    I've also noticed, Lydia, that you have this long-standing fued with Ann Coulter. I don't know, me, I just kind of see her as a provacateur/opportunist/cartoon character. I generally DON'T take her seriously and, no, tend not to respond (though I did do a recent post criticizing her for saying that liberal men weren't "real men"). To me, it would be kind of like debating Elmer Fudd"



    Funny i've ALWAYS seen TRYING to debate YOU as actually debating Elmer Fudd...........but you concern trolls DONT use projection Will do ya?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    I usually don't support Limbaugh. But,..


    :|

    Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    I hear your points, Lydia. But


    :|

    Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...


    I don't listen to him[Rush Limbaugh], Lydia. He appeals only to the base. And I realize that often his tenor is poor as well. But,

    ReplyDelete
  40. You seem like a reasonable fellow there Will,.."but"....

    ReplyDelete
  41. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Blogger MCH said...

    Thought I'd pop in to share some good news.

    Lately, I've been hanging out over at the ThinkProgress blog. As I'm sure you're aware, Bill "Falafel" O'reilly recently had one of his minions stalk and harrass one of the blog's editors. As a result, we started contacting his sponsors letting them know we don't appreciate the way he conducts business. UPS announced today they will no longer be advertising on his program.

    Score one for the good guys! We're taking our country back!"

    I've said for a LONG TIME its about time the progressives unified like the Right wing does to boycott sponsors or write in to complain.........they have RULED the corporate Right Wing owned MSM for WAY TOO LONG..........and they ALWAYS whine and cry like babies when someone in the MSM says something THEY dont like............look how Bill Maher got his show cancelled for voicing his opinion but Rush the drtug addict or Ann Coulter can lie, slander and say what ever they please.

    ReplyDelete
  43. My apologies for a previous post. Typed in a moment of annoyance and I'm working on improving that. I have deleted the post.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Gee, I used no profanity, called no names, did nothing in fact other than correctly identifying Will as a concern troll.

    Yet for some reason, MCH just "pops up" at the same time as Will, and is demanding that Lydia ban me.

    He's even strong arming her, threatening to leave until I am banned.

    I'm debating Will, using no profanity whatsoever, no name calling other than correctly identifying him as a concern troll, an yet for some odd reason, MCH is angry and demands I be banned.

    :|

    How odd.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Ahem.

    My apologies for a previous post. Typed in a moment of annoyance and I'm working on improving that. I have deleted the post.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Blogger MCH said...

    And people wonder why I left. Let me know when the only real troll this blog has gets banned ... again."


    Sorry MCH, nothing against you here.......but Bart's 100% right here Will is NOTHING more than a slimy Right Wing Concern Troll........go read his censored so called blog and you'll see beyond a reasonable doubt EXACTLTY what Will is.


    Concern trolling is the New tactic of the right wing.......ever wonder where all our old trolls like TT, FF, Volt, Crusty have all gone you actually think those deranged IDIOTS just gave up.........theres a new Right Wing concern troll born every few minutes MCH!

    ReplyDelete
  47. MCH said...

    My apologies for a previous post. Typed in a moment of annoyance and I'm working on improving that. I have deleted the post.



    How convenient.

    First he demands that I be banned, then he deletes the post.

    I guess he realized how revealing that one was.

    After all, that's not the first time ole MCH has called for my removal.

    In fact, he's called for it several times.

    He even called for it the first time he came in, declaring himself a "new blogger", who was "concerned" that Lydia allowed me to post here.

    And now he conveniently deletes his little slip up.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Ok, so apparently my apology has not been accepted.

    Good night all.

    ReplyDelete
  49. You have some of these people fooled MCH, but you're naked as a J Bird to me.

    You're a concern troll, nothing more.

    I smelled you the first day you waltzed in, declaring your "new blogger" status and calling for my banishment.

    ReplyDelete
  50. You've repeatedly called for my banishment.

    And tonight, you called for it again, THREATENING Lydia with your leaving if she did not ban me.

    Who does that?

    Seriously, who does that sort of stuff?

    I'll tell you who.

    A concern troll, too cowardly to openly defend the positions he's here trying to subtly sell.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I'd like that comment pulled from the deleted comments and reposted.

    I don't want to see MCH weasel his way out of this one tonight.

    He called for my banishment.

    He threatened Lydia with his leaving until I was banned.

    And then he realized he screwed up (because he's done that one too many times, and because I didn't say anything tonight that merited such a demand for my removal) so he quickly deleted the post before Lydia saw it and saw clearly his true intent here.

    ReplyDelete
  52. The words "I apologize" dont seem to mean much to you, do they, Bart-Worf-Sara?

    ReplyDelete
  53. My true intent in here, dumbass, was to share some news that I was feeling good about.

    Knew that was a mistake.

    Way to ruin my mood, Bart-Worf-Sara.

    ReplyDelete
  54. So go ahead, Bart-Worf-Sara, pretend to be the victim, pretend to be the hero, pretend to be a good guy. Go ahead and google my various nicknames and pull stuff having nothing to do with me and try to embarrass me again. Go ahead and attack every new person that comes in here because your paranoia is too deep to understand that new people might come in here once in a while.

    Go ahead and demonstrate how pathetic you truly are.

    Go ahead and make Lydia look like a pretender and a poser by posting all the love and peace messages and then turn her head while you fuck up her blog. She doesnt care, she told me.


    Go ahead. I dont give a shit anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  55. I was right the first time ... there is only one troll on this blog. And it's not Will, or Voltron or Freedom Fan.

    It's Worf-Bart-Sara.

    ReplyDelete
  56. MCH said...

    The words "I apologize" dont seem to mean much to you, do they, Bart-Worf-Sara?


    Save it for someone who believes you're anything more than one of our regular trolls who's been trying to get me off the blog since he's to pathetic to actually hold his own in a debate against me.

    ReplyDelete
  57. What truly amazes me is why you complain about Coulter or Limbaugh or Rove ... you're worse than any of them when it comes to twisting words and libelous attacks

    ReplyDelete
  58. MCH said...


    Go ahead and demonstrate how pathetic you truly are.

    Go ahead and make Lydia look like a pretender and a poser by posting all the love and peace messages and then turn her head while you fuck up her blog. She doesnt care, she told me.



    I'll go ahead and continue to expose you for the lying concern troll that you are.

    That I'll go ahead and do.

    You continue to try and convince her that I'm evil and keep threatening to leave if she doesn't ban me, like you did the very first time you came in, and like you're doing now.

    Your intentions are glaringly obvious and were from day one.

    You're a troll, who couldn't hold his own against me in a debate, so he crawled back in under a sockpuppet handle to try and drive a wedge between Lydia and me.

    Just like you're doing tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  59. We all know how you like to go fishing through the old posts to prove your point. Go look at your own comments sometime. You know I'm right.

    Lydia knows I'm right too. She just doesnt care.

    ReplyDelete
  60. MCH said...

    What truly amazes me is why you complain about Coulter or Limbaugh or Rove ... you're worse than any of them when it comes to twisting words and libelous attacks


    Really?

    Well you'd better check your eyeglasses because anyone reading THIS thread, can clearly see I said NOTHING to you.

    Said NOTHING wrong. Nothing profane. Nothing out of line. And NOTHING deserving of YOUR unwarranted ATTACK.

    You attacked me troll.

    Not the other way around.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Ok, Im going back to the adults' table now. Bart-Worf-Sara reminded me why I left in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  62. MCH said...

    We all know how you like to go fishing through the old posts to prove your point. Go look at your own comments sometime. You know I'm right.





    Perhaps you should take your own advice slick, and try reading yours.

    Because as we clearly see, you attacked me out of the blue.

    I said NADA to you.

    NOTHING.

    You attacked me, calling for my banishment and threatening Lydia with leaving her blog if she refused.

    Then, you realized how that comment exposed your true intents, so you deleted it.

    Quickly.

    Real quickly.

    And now you try to paint me as the aggressor.

    Well I said nothing to you tonight troll.

    You attacked me. For nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  63. MCH said...

    Ok, Im going back to the adults' table now. Bart-Worf-Sara reminded me why I left in the first place.


    Yea you said that an hour ago.

    Just like you always do.

    Until you come in whenever I am debating Will, and come to his aide.

    You're a troll.

    You're a liar.

    And you're a coward.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Sara said "Well I said nothing to you tonight troll."


    Key word being "tonight"

    ReplyDelete
  65. Doesnt matter. I typed something, realized it was a mistake, deleted it and apologized, and opened myself up again.

    Knew it was a mistake.

    Goodbye everybody.

    ReplyDelete
  66. The first night you came in you whined for Lydia to ban me.

    You threatened her with your leaving.

    Just like you did tonight.

    Just like you did a few weeks back.

    Just like you always do.

    You're a troll.

    And a coward, because you couldn't debate me on the issues so you hide behind your sockpuppet, trying to get me banned however you can.

    Just like you did the first time you came in.

    ReplyDelete
  67. MCH said...

    Doesnt matter. I typed something, realized it was a mistake, deleted it and apologized, and opened myself up again.

    Knew it was a mistake.


    We saw what you typed slick.

    You came out of the blue and demanded Lydia ban me or you'd leave.


    We saw it.


    You were just afraid that Lydia would see it.

    So you deleted it, realizing it exposed your true intent here.

    ReplyDelete
  68. MCH said...

    Sara said "Well I said nothing to you tonight troll."


    Key word being "tonight"


    So you've just admitted you attacked me unprovoked.

    So the question is....why?

    All I was doing was debating Will.

    Why should THAT.....bother YOU?

    :|

    I know why.

    ReplyDelete
  69. And quit calling me Sara. I'm not a girl in one of your sick bondage fantasies, perv.

    Unlike you I've never had to hide behind a sockpuppet to debate in here.

    I've been in here under worfeus and bartlebee, and variations of those handles (i.e. Ghost of Worfeus, Flavius Worfeus, etc)and never hidden behind a sockpuppet handle.

    That's for cowards like you.

    ReplyDelete
  70. MCH said...

    Ok, Im going back to the adults' table now. Bart-Worf-Sara reminded me why I left in the first place

    Knew it was a mistake.

    Goodbye everybody.



    Goodbye cruel world, lol.

    How many times are you going to do that? How many times are you going to come in and proclaim your departure because of mean old bartlebee?

    You act like I did something to you. Trying to change everything around.

    Lets be clear.

    You came into this thread and suddenly demanded for no apparent reason that Lydia ban me.

    Why?

    Why'd you do that?

    Why would you do that?

    And why would you now try to make it sound like I am "driving you out".

    You attacked me.

    You demanded Lydia ban me or you'd "leave".

    And now you're following through on that threat, (or pretending to) by declaring I've driven you out, again.

    Why would you do that?

    Why would anyone do that?

    ReplyDelete
  71. No Fear was also debating Will.

    Mike was also debating Will.

    And I was using no profanity (which you claimed one time was the reason you were "leaving"), no name calling other than identifying Will correctly as a concern troll, yet for some reason you chose to not only attack ME, and me alone, you chose to DEMAND Lydia "BAN" me.

    And now you're pretending that I drove YOU out.

    :|

    Why would anyone do that?

    ReplyDelete
  72. Now MCH, you know Bart has been banned multiple times on all the more popular blogs. If you get him banned here he'll have no choice but to harass Wesley Crusher again.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Hey, MCH, you were spot on about O'Reilly, bro. All that that 5'0" 100 pound girl did to him was accurately quote him. And then with the predictable Jesse Waters stalking stuff. I can only hope that some of the other sponsors will get the message, too.

    ReplyDelete
  74. "How many times are you going to do that? How many times are you going to come in and proclaim your departure because of [state nature of infraction here]..."

    This coming from Bart. That's rich.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Will,

    She "actually quoted him" out of context.
    While he did mention her attire, his main point was the alcohol consumption.

    And I DO agree that there is NO justification for assaulting a woman, but all the same I wouldn't walk around in Ethiopia dressed as a ham sandwich either.

    ReplyDelete
  76. As for all of this other stuff, MCH, just don't let it get to you. You seem to have a good relationship with Lydia and that's clearly a positive for you. Continue to be good friend to her and block out the rest; the dirty white noise, etc..

    ReplyDelete
  77. Fair enough, Volt but I do remember the segment. It was his usual judgemental tone and was at least a tad gratuitous.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Of course Will.

    It WAS O'Reilly for gods sake.

    ReplyDelete
  79. ...ahh, the friends we keep.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Now, why would Voltron want to respond for MCH? Why does he come to MCH's rescue?

    Or Wills? He's always defending Will for some reason.

    And why is Will responding for MCH?

    :|

    Its all so confusing.

    ReplyDelete
  81. You're not feeling confusion Bart.

    It's called "paranoia".

    ReplyDelete
  82. I think it's a side effect of megalomania..

    ReplyDelete
  83. It is nice how Voltron always seems to come to the aid of Will and MCH.

    You're all three such good fiends...er I mean friends.

    Such good friends.

    :|

    Its quite friendly.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Not so much coming to their rescue,
    I just enjoy a good dogpile on Bart.

    ReplyDelete
  85. But when we see them consistently come to each others defense, and consistently gang up on bart, well, don't you believe your own eyes.

    Because its just that crazy paranoia talking.

    :|

    And I know this because volty tells me so.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Voltron said...

    Not so much coming to their rescue,
    I just enjoy a good dogpile on Bart.


    Yea, most weaklings do.

    :|

    Its cause they're not much on their own.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Which is why trolls usually work best in pairs, and backed up by a sock puppet or two.

    Because they can't handle it on their own, so they use clever deception, and deceit, with their "bad cop\not so bad cop" routines, to try and sell their nonsense.

    :|

    And oddly enough they can't even do that right.

    ReplyDelete
  88. It couldn't possibly be that we each dislike you for our own reasons could it?

    ReplyDelete
  89. I mean really, what's not to like?

    1. You're arrogant...

    2. You're a know-it-all who misunderstands what he thinks he knows...

    3.You're arrogant...

    4. You have all the charm and wit of a slug...

    5. Did I mention you're arrogant?

    6. You're abusive to those whom you don't know...

    7. You're arrogant...

    I could go on but you get the drift.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Good one, Volt. Seriously, though, man, I not going to let these clowns get to me anymore. In fact, I'm actually starting to feel a tad sorry for them. I mean, think about it. To have NO intellectual/emotional capacity to appreciate (or even tolerate) another's view-point, to always have one of those ready-made/hackneyed labels available. I would think that to be a terrible existence. And like I alluded to before, sad as well.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Yeah speaking of "lightworkers", if there is a bright point in the universe, this blog is the farthest point removed from it.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Voltron said...

    if there is a bright point in the universe, this blog is the farthest point removed from it.




    Funny then that you so often find yourself here.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Quoting Luke Skywalker even.

    ReplyDelete
  94. So what does it say about a person, who criticizes a blog as dull witted, ignorant, insignificant, etc, ...yet that same person has blogged steadily for over three years there?

    ReplyDelete
  95. Since we're quoting Star Wars and all, what was that again that Obi Wan said about the "fool" and "the fool who follows him"?

    ReplyDelete
  96. Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    Good one, Volt




    Yea, ..you two should get a room.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...

    Good one, Volt. Seriously, though, man, I not going to let these clowns get to me anymore. In fact, I'm actually starting to feel a tad sorry for them


    So explain to us again why exactly you continue to blog here with us losers?

    ReplyDelete
  98. For three guys who think little of this blog and or its members, you sure do spend an awful lot of time here.

    :|

    Must be some reason, huh?

    ReplyDelete
  99. Yea I figured you'd have to chew on that one for a while.

    Well you let me know when one of you comes up with an story on that one.

    I'll be all ears. As well others I am sure.

    ReplyDelete
  100. So now we see the level of deception you will stoop.

    Anyone reading that knows its not me.

    You are only further confirming your utter lack of character and your true intent here.

    ReplyDelete
  101. You can't debate me, so you go to the most extensive lengths I've ever seen anyone go to attack me, and turn people against me.

    Now, going so far as to impersonate me, misrepresent yourself with my photo, and spout nonsense as if anyone is dumb enough to believe it is me typing that nonsense.

    And yet none of your trickery has worked.

    For years I've watched you squirm, confounded by your own pathetic inability to debate me on the issues, and thus turning to all manner of deception and distortion to try and turn others against me and drive me out.

    And yet none of it has worked.

    What does that say about you?

    :|

    ReplyDelete
  102. I know what it says about you.

    :|

    Do you?

    ReplyDelete
  103. Well, lets see, MCH came in tonight, and demanded Lydia ban me.

    Then he panicked, deleted his comment, said he was leaving and now someones impersonating me.

    :|

    hmmmmmm, who could it be?

    ReplyDelete
  104. Lydia,

    The comments made at
    10:28, 10:30, 10:31, 10:33, 10:34, 10:37, 10:38, 10:41, were not made by me.

    This is MCH\Will pretending to me, desperately trying to do some sort of damage to me, because he is impotent when debating me.

    You'll note that he was too stupid to notice at first that I capitalized my handle, so he did it in lower case in the first half dozen comments there, giving himself away.

    He caught his error later, and now is capitalizing the handle, but the moron screwed up at first, showing his hand.

    Please delete these comments when you get a chance.

    ReplyDelete
  105. Yipes, it looks like all the winners were here tonight the frickin boring dude an his conservotard goon buddy an frickin Bart an Mike.

    ReplyDelete
  106. Uhh mch, I like frickin defended you from Bart an that skank sockpuppet Jackie an this is the frickin thanks I get.

    Either your like too dumb to like tell the difference between a frickin goon sock puppet named Jackie an me or your paranoid dude, either way screw you an frickin horse you rode in on LOSER.

    ReplyDelete
  107. Hey Voltron you frickin goon, hope you frickin like payin for my national health care like I had to like pay for your frickin war.

    ReplyDelete
  108. Yea Volt, its just my "paranoia".

    Sure.


    I just imagined MCH coming in to aid Will by demanding Lydia ban me.

    I just imagined MCH then quickly deleting the comment, realizing that he was exposing himself.

    Then I just imagined you and Will coming in to his aid.

    Then I just imagined that suddenly one of you was impersonating me.

    And now I'm just imagining Sara is suddenly here.

    :|

    I must have a wonderful imagination.

    ReplyDelete
  109. You know you've beaten your opponent in a blog when they have nothing left but to assume your identity and spout nonsense trying to make it look like its you.

    That's the end of the game.

    That's when they've lost.

    From this day forward, a person would have to be pretty stupid to believe you, Will, MCH, or Sara, are anything more than some snot nosed right wing punk(s) playing juvenile tricks and using deception, lies and misdirection to try and disrupt this blog and drive me out.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Sorry, Bart-Worf-Jackie, (my apologies, Sara, I did get the names screwed up)

    I confess to laughing my @ss off when I read the blog but, no, I'm not the imposter (if there is one. hmmm....) You're not worth the time and energy it would take to come up with it.


    Could it be you came up with your own imposter so you could claim one of us was doing it?

    ReplyDelete
  111. Lydia, I've been blogging for 2 years now and I've never once blogged under any other marker but Will "take no prisoners" Hart. I mean, you and MCH E-mail each other, right? You, more than anybody, would know that we're 2 different people. And Voltron and I live in flaming different time zones. Do you not agree that this is getting rather silly?

    ReplyDelete
  112. I do need to clear up one other misconception ...

    Lydia and I have emailed however we are not in constant contact nor are we in the same friendship circles. Just wanted to make sure reports of our friendship arent overblown.

    ReplyDelete
  113. Honestly, even though I keep leaving and saying I wont be back, why do I keep coming here?

    Because deep down I'm still the love-smitten teenager who fell in love with Lydia. Because she and I do agree on most things politically and I've learned a lot from being here. Because I do enjoy a good debate with intelligent people on the other side of the political spectrum ... and contrary to what the the king of Paranoia and Conspiracy would have us believe, Will and Voltron are intelligent.

    Bart-Worf-Jackie, you are not man enough to drive me away. I will stop being here and contributing to the discussion IF and ONLY IF Lydia asks me to leave ... and if she does, I will not follow your example and only leave for 2 weeks. I fully intend to ignore you and your maniacal rantings and have some good, solid and RESPECTABLE debate with Will and Voltron and anybody else who wishes to discuss things rationally.

    You can join me, or you can ignore me, or you can try and fail to draw me into another argument. The choice is up to you.

    Oh, and one last thing. The whole blog knows of my other interests, and the whole blog also knows that I am not the mch1968 whose post you pulled off some obscure website so you might as well stop referring to them in an effort to embarrass me. I fully expect you to sign in any day now as "Jackie" and slam me a few times; it's up to you of course.


    I'm finished with Bart-Worf-Jackie. Now, does anybody have anything relevant they wish to discuss?

    ReplyDelete
  114. Last note to Sara,

    I humbly apologize. I was referring to Jackie when I was connecting "her" to Bart-Worf but for some reason, the name "Sara" kept popping into my head. It was not an intentional mistake. I very much appreciate the times you have stuck up for me, and I will continue to do the same for you as I have in the past.

    ReplyDelete
  115. MCH said...

    , no, I'm not the imposter (if there is one. hmmm....) You're not worth the time and energy it would take to come up with it.


    Could it be you came up with your own imposter so you could claim one of us was doing it?



    No slick, it was you.

    You were the one who came in, and for NO VISIBLE REASON, DEMANDED LYDIA BAN ME.

    You THREATENED HER with your LEAVING, if she refused to comply.

    As you have done repeatedly in the past.

    As you did the first time you came in here, when you emailed her demanding she ban me or you'd leave.

    No MCH, you're the one who did it.

    You're the one who got upset, stormed off, then suddenly Sara appears, then suddenly someones impersonating me.

    And now you are magically "back", the next morning, denying it and trying to paint more onus of your nonsense onto me.

    Trying desperately to turn Lydia against me, and get me banned.

    Like you've done from the first time you came in.

    Because you can't hang with me, so you try to get me banned.

    Cause you're a wimp.

    ReplyDelete
  116. Drat boys we've been exposed, lets focus on our other missions.

    What old Barty dont realize is that the same group of actors has infiltrated TP and many other librl blogs.

    Hi Ho my band of merry men we have librls to skewer and blogs to rule and conquer.

    ReplyDelete
  117. Hi ho,hi,ho its of to TP we go,come on Will,Rusty,MCH

    ReplyDelete
  118. No we realized it.

    I see you in TP MCH.

    So does half the liberal bloggers there who correctly identify you as a concern troll.

    You clowns are so pathetic, you couldn't handle me in a debate 3 years ago, and you've wasted 3 years of your lives trying to get me banned, etc.

    I see you in TP. You're fooling no one other than yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  119. Karl Rove - I am 12 years old but I didn't know everyone on this blog was 12 too.

    I knew it! So YOU are the imposter who wrote the "poop" comments and the Georgie Porgie pudding and pie... comments earlier.

    I can't imagine Bart writing those about himself, so obviously this was an imposter.

    You sound just like Moo Moo!

    Hey listen everyone: I have to delete comments that are too personal in attacking others, and with the "f" word, etc.

    You can argue, but try to keep it clean.

    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Feel free, Lydia, and I apologize to the board as a whole for my allowing my emotions to get the better of me.

    ReplyDelete
  121. MCH said...

    ...and might I add that your hair is looking very lovely today Mrs Cleaver.

    ReplyDelete
  122. Bart said: MCH said...

    ...and might I add that your hair is looking very lovely today Mrs Cleaver.



    Sorry, Bart, wrong sitcom.

    ReplyDelete
  123. Yea?

    Well stop playing Eddie Haskell then, troll.

    ReplyDelete
  124. So, safe to assume I won't be getting any apologies anytime soon for your falsely accusing me of being the imposter?

    ReplyDelete
  125. Oh I'm sorry. Did something suddenly change?

    Did some new piece of information come out revealing that you weren't the impostor that I missed?

    You ARE the impostor. You've always been the impostor.

    ReplyDelete
  126. Lydia said: Karl Rove - I am 12 years old but I didn't know everyone on this blog was 12 too.

    I knew it! So YOU are the imposter who wrote the "poop" comments and the Georgie Porgie pudding and pie... comments earlier.

    I can't imagine Bart writing those about himself, so obviously this was an imposter.

    You sound just like Moo Moo!



    Then Bart said: Oh I'm sorry. Did something suddenly change?




    It's close enough, I accept your apology.

    ReplyDelete
  127. I said you ARE the impostor.

    What are you illiterate as well as a sex perv, troll?

    ReplyDelete
  128. Now then, Think Progress is expanding their list of sponsors to send the emails too. If you would like to help stop Bill O'Reilly and his stalker-form of broadcasting, you can do so here:

    http://thinkprogress.org/stop-oreilly-harassment/

    ReplyDelete
  129. You're a scumbag MCH. A coward. A low life lying troll and you've been exposed for what you are.

    A person would have to be a complete idiot to think you were anything other than a liar and a troll and one of the regulars who's clock I cleaned three years ago.

    The first week you came in you tried to get Lydia to ban me.

    Remember that troll boy?

    The very first week, and you were already whining to Lydia, "I'm afraid if you don't ban Bartlebee I'm going to have to leave your blog....wah wahh wahhhh"

    Remember that troll?

    Remember that?

    ReplyDelete
  130. And now you've exposed yourself as the troll you are for all to see.

    You came in last night, trolling on behalf of Will, trying to run interference for him.

    And when I nailed you, you got mad , stormed out declaring "GOODBYE EVERYONE", and then suddenly there was Sara. (who you'd been calling me all night). And suddenly there was an impostor, pretending to be me.

    As soon as you left.

    So no MCH, no ones stupid enough to think you're anything more than a two bit lying troll, stalking liberal blogs, claiming to BE A LIBERAL, and yet always seeming to voice your "concerns" over the positions taken by actual liberals.

    You're the worst kind of troll, because you haven't the balls to stand up for what you believe openly.

    You do it from a cowering concealed position.

    :|

    Just like you like your women.

    ReplyDelete
  131. Lydia Cornell said...


    Hey listen everyone: I have to delete comments that are too personal in attacking others, and with the "f" word, etc.


    I didn't use the "f" word.

    In fact I didn't use any profanity whatsoever.

    You must be talking to the troll calling itself MCH.

    ReplyDelete
  132. MCH said...


    the whole blog also knows that I am not the mch1968 whose post you pulled off some obscure website so you might as well stop referring to them in an effort to embarrass me


    Really?


    Well that's not what you were saying before.


    MCH said...

    Ok, I need to clarify.

    -- Bart brought up certain interests of mine in an effort to embarrass me ...




    And of course you admitted when you first came in that that was you.

    You came in as MCH1968, then when Clif posted the same posts you're referring to above, showing your online fantasies about raping women, you immediately changed your handle, chastising yourself in front of all of us for being so foolish in using it.

    And yet today, you claim that it wasn't you.

    Which proves you are a liar.

    ReplyDelete
  133. And as far as being an "effort to embarrass" you, you embarrassed yourself when you posted them on the world wide web for all the world to see.

    We didn't tell you to post your sick, twisted fantasies about raping women and such. That was your doing. We only pointed it out as pertaining to your character, or in this case, lack thereof.

    And since I only bring it up when you stoop to lies and deceit, like impersonating me, and calling me "SARA", and calling me "JACKIE", then you might try not stooping so low all the time.

    Then you wouldn't have to put on your Eddie Haskell face, and keep apologizing like you do to Lydia and everyone else for being such a dirtbag.

    If you'd stop being a dirtbag, people would stop treating you like one.

    ReplyDelete
  134. Ok, History lesson time for those too stupid to do remember it for themselves:

    My first appearance on the blog was May 27, 2007. That's slightly less than 2 years. So, Bart, does that mean you started arguing and fighting and 'cleaning my clock' a solid year before I even knew the blog existed?

    As for whining to Lydia the very first week, the truth of the matter is I didnt say anything of the kind to her until 05/03/08. That's almost a solid year later. Here is a partial transcript of that email: "Bartlebee's ever-growing anger has been making me more and more uncomfortable in your blog and he finally tipped me over the edge. He made another "short bus" comment which, as a parent of special needs kids, I found insulting and called him on it and he flamed me big time. I used to love your blog and I have learned a lot but lately all it has been is one huge profanity laced, frothing at the mouth, angry rant from Bart and I just cant do it anymore. As I said in my last post, I have blogs I can go to where my kids and I wont be insulted."


    Lydia has not given me permission to quote her response and so I won't. I'm sure you would find it very interesting however.

    Oh, and for the record, I'm not the one who introduced the bondage topic into Lydia's blog, nor was it Clif ... it was you. You're also the one who brought up the fiction of my wanting to rape anybody.


    Now can you PLEASE drop this fascination you have with me? It's really getting quite annoying.

    ReplyDelete
  135. No troll.

    Deal with THIS lie first.


    the whole blog also knows that I am not the mch1968 whose post you pulled off some obscure website so you might as well stop referring to them in an effort to embarrass me

    Now.

    Admit you were lying here.


    Then I'll deal with your other nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  136. Either admit the lie, or restate it.

    You've no where else to go.

    ReplyDelete
  137. I never claimed I was not MCH1968. I just said I was not the MCH1968 who had the post on that obscure website about raping his niece.

    If you're going to reinvent history, you need to do a better job of it.

    ReplyDelete
  138. MCH said...

    I never claimed I was not MCH1968. I just said I was not the MCH1968 who had the post on that obscure website about raping his niece.



    Oh yea, that's right. It was your niece. lol

    I'd forgotten.

    Funny you remembered, huh?

    :|

    Course the odd thing is, you didn't deny it then. You admitted it was you.

    Now you deny it.

    So were you lying then, or are you lying now?

    ReplyDelete
  139. Nice.

    But not an answer.

    So here, I'll answer for you while you're out buying a new keyboard.

    You're lying now.

    Because for us to believe that that wasn't you, ....we'd have to believe that there are not one, but TWO characters on the web with the handle "MCH1968", who is ALSO into BONDAGE and posts on bondage sites.

    And as anyone with a reasonable grasp of mathematics and statistics knows, the possibility of that is insurmountable.

    There might be two MCH's. There might be lots of MCH's.

    There might be MCH's that use numbers after their name.

    And there is an EXTREMELY remote, albeit possibility that someone might use the same exact four numbers, in the same exact order as you.

    Albeit that's remote, giving the almost endless variables when dealing with FOUR DIGITS.

    But that there's an MCH on the internet, who not only has numbers after his handle, but the EXACT SAME FOUR NUMBERS as you, in the SAME ORDER, AND who posts on Bondage sites?

    No way.

    Not even in the realm of the possible.

    Hence, you are lying.

    ReplyDelete
  140. Now, isn't it about time for one of your sock puppet handles to show up, to take up where you left off?

    ReplyDelete
  141. Or are you taking them with you this time?

    ReplyDelete
  142. Oh and I'll see you in TP.

    When the rest of the regulars are correctly identifying you as a concern troll like they did a few weeks ago, just look around.

    I'll be there.

    ReplyDelete
  143. MCH said...

    I TRIED! YOU ALL SAW THAT I TRIED!!! AND THIS MURDERING PIECE OF CRAP JUST REFUSES TO LET IT LIE!!!!!


    Some day, when you return from this latest departure, you might explain to me how I'm a "MUDERING piece of crap".

    Piece of crap? Ok. That's a personal opinion you're free to possess.

    But murdering?

    Who exactly was I murdering?

    ReplyDelete
  144. This line however, is quite telling, albeit unintentionally.


    JUST REFUSES TO LET IT LIE!!!!!


    You're right.

    I do refuse to let "it" lie.

    The "it" being you, and the lie being the lies you are telling in here.

    And if I'm wrong? Prove it.

    Give us a plausible explanation of why you come in last night and just completely out of the blue demanded Lydia ban me?

    Huh?

    For all your rants here today, you've yet to answer that question from last night.

    Why did you come in, and without ANY PROVOCATION WHATSOEVER FROM ME, ...demand Lydia ban me?

    Why?

    :|

    I know why, but you need to tell us why.

    When you can answer THAT question, and answer it honestly, then you'll be on your way to healing from your life of delusion and lies, and from your utterly perverted obsession with trying to convince Lydia to ban me.


    Come into the light little troll.

    Walk into the light.

    ReplyDelete
  145. "See, I never tried to get Lydia to ban anyone. "

    Really?

    Was that BEFORE you started hacking this blog to make it look like people were being locked out so you could offer Lydia your "security services"?

    Or was it AFTER you took control of the blog and started deleting everyone who disagreed with you?

    Good thing that didn't last too long eh? At least Wesley Crusher saw right through you when you were stalking him...

    ReplyDelete
  146. See?

    Told you it wouldn't be long before one of your sock puppets turned up to take over for you.

    ReplyDelete
  147. Voltron said...



    Was that BEFORE you started hacking this blog to make it look like people were being locked out so you could offer Lydia your "security services"?

    Or was it AFTER you took control of the blog and started deleting everyone who disagreed with you



    Both baseless lies made by a desperate sock puppet,(or in this case, suck-puppet) who is seeing his concern puppets foundering before his very eyes.

    ReplyDelete
  148. I can almost smell your desperation.

    ReplyDelete
  149. Oh and as for my supposed "stalking" of Wil Wheaton?

    I made one comment in his blog.

    :|

    That's what you call "stalking"?

    :|

    Then what does that make you, who has "stalked" this blog for over 3 years now?

    ReplyDelete
  150. Super stalking sock puppet?

    ReplyDelete
  151. "There might be two MCH's. There might be lots of MCH's.

    There might be MCH's that use numbers after their name."


    ....

    "Albeit that's remote, giving the almost endless variables when dealing with FOUR DIGITS."



    Actually Bart, those "exact four digits" don't have to necessarily be random.

    "1968" could be a year. Could be his birth year. Could be a year in which something memorable happened to this person.

    Since YOU have established that "MCH" could be a fairly common occurance, it isn't that "remote" that two of them might have been born in the same year.

    Just sayin...

    ReplyDelete
  152. Actually Bart, I'd have to find the post again but I believe you offered him your "services" as well...

    ReplyDelete
  153. Sock Puppet said...

    Since YOU have established that "MCH" could be a fairly common occurance, it isn't that "remote" that two of them might have been born in the same year.

    Just sayin...



    Yea...two people, both with the exact same initials.

    Born on the same year.

    Who use their initials AND their birth year as their handle.

    In the EXACT same way.

    And they BOTH are into bondage and post in bondage sites.

    THATS your rebuttal?

    :|

    Apparently they didn't teach statistics in your public school system.

    ReplyDelete
  154. Voltron said...

    Actually Bart, I'd have to find the post again but I believe you offered him your "services" as well...



    Yea, well you go find the post and show what it actually said, instead of what you "believe".

    This blog is full of your "beliefs" which all have been proven to be quite different from the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  155. "Yea...two people, both with the exact same initials.

    Born on the same year."


    You're right. I'm sure that never happens.

    ReplyDelete
  156. "

    Wil,

    I know you are probably sick of hearing this, but you rocked on Next Gen!

    You were really an important character in one of the most frequently run shows in syndication.

    I would not feel too bad about that if I were you.

    And yes, you blew us all away in Stand By Me.

    So ok, call me a fan. But I am 45 years, old, and I can probably help you with your site, and some of your technical issues.

    I am a consultant.

    So email me if you want, I will be happy to help if I can.

    If your only 30, you got a long way to go. I feel sometimes like I'm just gettin going at 45.

    You got your whole life still in front of you.

    But don't dis your Star Trek Years. You were perfect for that role, you performed it perfectly, and you will always be remembered fondly as Wesley Crusher, (I know, you'd rather not), and that's not a bad thing.

    P.S

    I am just starting to read some of your political stuff, and it looks like you have some good stuff to say. Have you checked out Lydia Cornell's Blog yet?

    Check it out, drop in and drop a note. She makes a lot of sense.
    www.lydiacornell.com

    Your fan, WORFEUS"


    -Posted by: WORFEUS | December 21, 2005 04:00 PM



    Your fan, Volt...

    ReplyDelete
  157. "So ok, call me a fan. But I am 45 years, old, and I can probably help you with your site, and some of your technical issues.

    I am a consultant.

    So email me if you want, I will be happy to help if I can."


    Sounds like an offer of services to me...

    ReplyDelete
  158. That was kinda gooey though Bart.

    I feel kinda dirty just reading it...

    ReplyDelete
  159. Voltron said...

    "Yea...two people, both with the exact same initials.

    Born on the same year."

    You're right. I'm sure that never happens.



    Clearly they didn't even teach mathematics at your schools.

    Otherwise you'd have completed the equation.

    Two men, with the EXACT same initials, (THREE initials, not two).

    Who were born on the EXACT SAME DATE.

    Who USE BOTH all three of their initials as a handle.

    Who ALSO BOTH USE THEIR BIRTHDATE's after their initials.

    In the exact same way.

    And who also BOTH are not only into bondage fantasies, but who BOTH post in bondage fantasy sites.

    :|

    Its so mathematically off the charts as to not even be plausible.

    But as always, you, the troll, want us to believe the most UNLIKELY and ABSURDLY REMOTE scenario, as opposed to the obvious.

    And you call me stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  160. So lets see. This is what is freaky to you. Lets see.


    Voltron said...

    "So ok, call me a fan. But I am 45 years, old, and I can probably help you with your site, and some of your technical issues.

    I am a consultant.

    So email me if you want, I will be happy to help if I can."




    So what is wrong with this again?

    He was talking about issues with his site.

    I post ONE comment, and offer him help.

    And I never posted on his site again.

    And THAT's the best you got?

    ReplyDelete
  161. Doesn't have to be the "exact same date", just the same year. Big difference...

    AND we're only talking about an innocent coincidence, and if there was duplicity involved?

    You'll note there was a poster above in this very thread who had the same moniker and picture as you do...

    ReplyDelete
  162. So lets see.

    I get into it with Will last night, and MCH comes to his aid.

    I expose MCH's nonsense last night, and he storms off declaring his Goodbyes and calling me SARA.


    Then immediately Sara suddenly shows up, and starts spouting nonsense and someone else begin immediately impersonating me and spouting more profane nonsense.

    Then MCH returns in the morning, gets into it with me again, freaks out and goes insane, rants a profane raging tirade and storms off.

    Then you come in and pick up where he left off, scouring the internet for something to insult me with.

    :|

    And you come up with ONE SINGLE COMMENT in Wil Wheatons blog?

    ReplyDelete
  163. No Barty, not freaky.

    I said I "believed" you offered him your services. While you didn't out right deny it, you did call my memory into question.

    That should prove my memory.

    ReplyDelete
  164. Voltron said...

    Doesn't have to be the "exact same date", just the same year. Big difference..



    Wrong Archimedes.

    If you folks had included math in your home school lessons instead of pond fishing and hog calling then you'd know that FOUR numbers, is significant.

    The combination of four digits means there is TEN THOUSAND different combination's of the numbers.

    The likely hood therefore is reduced to an infinitesimal fraction when the other factors are factored in.

    ReplyDelete
  165. Voltron said...

    No Barty, not freaky.

    I said I "believed" you offered him your services. While you didn't out right deny it, you did call my memory into question.

    That should prove my memory.



    Proves your memory doesn't include remembering what you wrote 10 minutes ago.



    Voltron said...

    That was kinda gooey though Bart.

    I feel kinda dirty just reading it..




    And it also proves you're obsessed with me, and most likely SAVED that comment, because I went out to his blog and I can't find it doing a search under my handle.

    Seems to me you're obsessed with me Volt.

    Kinda like MCH.

    Kinda like Will.

    ReplyDelete
  166. You know what else is odd?

    Both you and Will have blogs, that are recent, except they're on the Old "Blogspot" servers.

    Will's only been up for a year or so, yet blogger stopped handing out those addresses years ago.

    Yet for some reason, both you and Will, who set up relatively recent blogs, BOTH use "BLOGSPOT.COM" addresses.


    Isn't that interesting?

    :|

    I think that's interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  167. "If you folks had included math in your home school lessons instead of pond fishing and hog calling then you'd know that FOUR numbers, is significant.

    The combination of four digits means there is TEN THOUSAND different combination's of the numbers."


    So you think it's possible he was born in 1689? or how about 1896?

    There may very well be ten thousand different combination's of the four numbers, but only TWO combination's would give someone a believable birth year. If we are to assume that's what it means, and I would think that's a reasonable deduction.

    ReplyDelete
  168. Don't you find that interesting Lydia?

    That ole Will, who supposedly has only had that blog up for a year or so, has a "blogspot.com" address, just like Volty?

    I think that's a fascinating tidbit of data.

    :|

    I think that's like a mini Rosetta Stone, to understanding our resident troll.

    ReplyDelete
  169. Really Bart? You think that's interesting?

    Tell you what, look up ANY blog on blogger where the homepage isn't on a private server and tell me what you see.

    As to memory, we've been down that road before too. You lost.

    ReplyDelete
  170. Voltron said...


    So you think it's possible he was born in 1689? or how about 1896?


    Nope. But you're assuming the number is a birth date, and not something else.

    And if it is a birth date, then we'd have to believe that two guys, born on the same year, with the same not two, but THREE initials, who also happen to use those three initials AND their birthdate, as a handle, to post in bondage sites.

    :|

    The likelihood is infinitesimal.

    But you'd have us believe that, rather than the obvious.

    ReplyDelete
  171. As in Ockham's razor, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one, so too here the simplest explanation is that the two MCH1968's on the web who also post on bondage sites, are the same person.

    It is HIGHLY unlikely that they are different people.

    But you for some reason, are in here right after MCH stormed out, trying desperately to get us to believe the most UNLIKELY scenario.

    And THAT is the real noteworthy factor here.

    ReplyDelete
  172. Could be someone doesn't like him besides you.

    It'd pretty much be impossible for someone to post under your identity on this blog wouldn't it?

    (that's sarcasm by the way...)

    ReplyDelete
  173. "But you for some reason, are in here right after MCH stormed out,..."

    3:55 to 7:21 is "right after"?

    You think I waited three and a half hours just to make it look good?

    ReplyDelete
  174. You're right about the blogspot thing I didn't know because I don't have a blog on blogger and someone told me those were the old addresses. So you can have that one.

    ReplyDelete
  175. Voltron said...

    "But you for some reason, are in here right after MCH stormed out,..."

    3:55 to 7:21 is "right after"?

    You think I waited three and a half hours just to make it look good?



    To cool down is more like it.

    ReplyDelete
  176. And personally, I don't particularly care what you believe.

    I'm just trying to show you there is more than one way to look at it. I may be wrong, maybe it was him.

    The point is that you do not know with any more certainty than I do.

    Yet you pretend you do.

    ReplyDelete
  177. "So you can have that one."

    Glad you allowed me to "have" that one...LOL

    ReplyDelete
  178. Well have fun, I'm gonna go put a bug in Will's ear. He's got a post up on how the Communist News Network is more fair and balanced than PMSDNC...

    ReplyDelete
  179. Voltron said...

    Could be someone doesn't like him besides you.

    It'd pretty much be impossible for someone to post under your identity on this blog wouldn't it?


    Yea, and that unknown "someone" just happened to be here at the same time he was last night.

    The blog is DEAD all week, then I come in and get into it with Will.


    So MCH comes in and demands Lydia ban me. She doesn't.

    So MCH storms off vowing never to return, and suddenly this unknown "someone" just happens to pop up and start impersonating me.

    And at the same time SARA just appears and starts spouting nonsense.

    And then the next morning MCH returns from his exile, only to launch into a raging tirade of profane name calling and storms off vowing once more never to return, and YOU show up.

    And you not only show up, but you pick up SEAMLESSLY where he left off, trying to convince us that he was the MCH1968 in all those online bondage sites, .....except for that one, single site.


    :|


    Just like every single time I get into it with Will or MCH.

    The ring around the rosie happens, just like its happening now.

    ReplyDelete
  180. I'll check back later to see if you've done any introspection on the limits of your powers superman...

    ReplyDelete
  181. Voltron said...

    "So you can have that one."

    Glad you allowed me to "have" that one...LOL



    If you say something correct, I always acknowledge.

    I just wish you'd say more stuff correct for me to acknowledge.

    And what I really wish, is you would grow a pair, admit what you are.

    ReplyDelete
  182. But you know what they say.


    Wish in one hand...

    ReplyDelete
  183. Voltron said...

    I'll check back later to see if you've done any introspection on the limits of your powers superman.



    Nope. I'm done wasted enough time on you MCH\Voltron.

    You're too much of a worm to admit what you are. You live behind a wall of deceit, and you're a coward, and you lie, lie lie.

    I despise liars more than anything else.

    You can say what you want about me but I tell the truth in here and always have.

    You however are a born liar. And you wouldn't know truth if it landed on your empty head.

    ReplyDelete
  184. Might be possible that MCH and Sara didn't have dates on Friday night I suppose.

    Maybe she was between shows at the Tropicana, she was making noises about having someone pay for her pole burns.

    As for me, like I said, I just enjoy a good dogpile on Bart....LOL

    ReplyDelete
  185. "You're too much of a worm to admit what you are. You live behind a wall of deceit, and you're a coward, and you lie, lie lie.

    I despise liars more than anything else."


    What would you like me to admit Bart?
    What would make you happy?

    I've told you who I am, where I live, where I work, what I do and how to get a hold of me.

    You think I lied? Give me a call. Send me a letter. The numbers are real. I'm real.

    Your despisement on that account is misplaced.

    You want to despise me for what I believe? That's your prerogative.

    Just know what it is your despising. The simple fact that someone holds a different opinion than you do.

    ReplyDelete
  186. I'm pumped, Volt. You want to know why I'm pumped? I'll tell ya' why I'm pumped. We're going to the frigging final four, baby!!!!!! UConn forever, baby!!!! Yesseree!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  187. Now if I could only make those NCAA rules viotations go away. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  188. I'm not a big sports fan Will, other than motorsports.

    Not big on NASCAR either. Talk to me about Formula One Grand Prix...

    Who do think will win the Austrailian GP?....LOL

    BTW, I was just headed to your place to dispute the notion that CNN is shooting straight...

    ReplyDelete
  189. Voltron said...


    What would you like me to admit Bart?
    What would make you happy?



    Well you can start by confessing your lies.

    That would make me happy.


    Here, you can start with this one.



    Was that BEFORE you started hacking this blog to make it look like people were being locked out so you could offer Lydia your "security services"?




    You can recant your lying slander accusing me of a criminal act.

    You can start there junior.

    ReplyDelete
  190. Then when you're done recanting and apologizing for slandering me and lying about that, you can then work on this one.


    Voltron said...

    Or was it AFTER you took control of the blog and started deleting everyone who disagreed with you?




    Recanting this foul lie would be another step towards your redemption.

    :|

    Albeit a very small step at the bottom of a very long staircase.

    ReplyDelete
  191. Then, when you're recanting those two lies, and apologizing for them, you can work on this one.


    Good thing that didn't last too long eh? At least Wesley Crusher saw right through you when you were stalking him...

    Which since I only posted once on his blog is by definition a lie, since "ONE COMMENT ON A BLOG" does not constitute "stalking" by any definition.

    Recanting this whopper and apologizing would be another big step towards your ultimate albeit distant redemption.

    ReplyDelete
  192. There. I think I've given you enough to work on for a while.


    Keep me posted on how those assignments are coming and if you run into trouble, just ask yourself what Will would do, then do the opposite.

    ReplyDelete
  193. Well the first one we don't really know now do we?
    Also others, myself included, were falsely accused of that by you and Lydia too.

    The second well, that was "sarcasm or exaggeration for effect".

    Lydia said that was OK.

    ReplyDelete
  194. So I suppose I could retract my statement if you guys will.

    ReplyDelete
  195. As to Crusher, I suppose you weren't actually "stalking" him. But that post was awfully fawning...

    ReplyDelete
  196. Voltron said...

    Well the first one we don't really know now do we?


    I know that.

    And anyone with access to the server will know that.

    And thats all that matters since its me you're making this foul, ugly baseless criminal accusation against.

    And based on that sort baseless generalized broad sweeping accusation, we could say the same thing about ANYONE.

    Its a lie, and you know it, and you are a worm for spreading such filth.

    ReplyDelete